TL;DR
Get smart everyday buys delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Kiplinger reports that $1,000 invested in QQQ 20 years ago would be worth about $20,000, including reinvested dividends, compared with about $8,000 for SPY. The larger return came with greater volatility: QQQ fell about 36% from its peak during the 2021–22 rate-rise downturn, compared with roughly 25% for SPY.
Kiplinger estimates that $1,000 invested in the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) 20 years ago would now be worth about $20,000, compared with approximately $8,000 in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The comparison includes reinvested dividends, and the report stresses that QQQ’s stronger historical return came with greater volatility and a deeper decline during the 2021–22 market downturn.
The report puts QQQ’s annualized total return over the period at 16.1%, compared with 11% for SPY. Total return accounts for price changes and reinvested dividends, so these figures are not simply a comparison of share-price appreciation. The reported dollar values are rounded estimates, and the source material does not state the precise dates used to calculate the 20-year period.
The funds also differ in their holdings. QQQ tracks the 100 largest nonfinancial companies listed on the Nasdaq, according to the report. Its five largest holdings named there are Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Micron Technology and Amazon, which together represent about 30% of the ETF. SPY tracks the S&P 500, a broader large-company index that includes financial firms and holds substantially more stocks.
Kiplinger says QQQ dropped about 36% from its peak when interest rates rose rapidly in 2021 and 2022. SPY’s drawdown over the same broad downturn was about 25%. These figures describe declines from market peaks, not the annualized returns over the full 20-year comparison.
Higher Returns Came With Deeper Losses
The comparison illustrates how an investment’s composition can shape both its long-term performance and its risk. QQQ’s heavier concentration in large technology and communications companies helped it during a period when those businesses gained market value. That same concentration can leave the fund more exposed when growth stocks fall or investor expectations change.
SPY’s lower reported return does not mean it avoided losses, but its broader mix of companies and smaller exposure to individual mega-cap stocks helped limit the peak-to-trough decline cited in the report. For readers comparing the funds, the key point is not just that $1,000 grew to different amounts; it is that the larger historical gain was paired with a larger fall during a downturn. Past results describe one particular 20-year period and do not guarantee future performance.
Products Worth Considering
HP OfficeJet 250 Wireless Mobile All-in-One Inkjet Printer
Apple MacBook Pro 2023 with M2 Pro Chip, 14‑inch, 16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD – Space Gray
Apple MacBook Air 15-inch (2026) with M5 chip, 16GB memory, 512GB SSD, Silver
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Different Indexes, Different Exposures
QQQ follows the Nasdaq-100, which includes large nonfinancial companies listed on the Nasdaq. That structure leaves out financial companies and gives the largest companies considerable influence over the fund’s results. The report says its five largest holdings collectively made up about 30% of assets, making their performance especially relevant to QQQ.
SPY follows the S&P 500, which spans companies across more sectors, including banks and insurers. Kiplinger says technology and communications companies account for nearly 48% of the S&P 500, but their influence is spread across a larger set of stocks than in QQQ. The article links the funds’ historical return gap to the rise of technology companies over the period and the difficult environment for financial stocks after the global financial crisis. That explanation is the report’s account of past performance, not a forecast.
“If you invested $1,000 in QQQ 20 years ago, it would today be worth $20,000.”
— Kiplinger report
The Measurement Date Is Not Given
The supplied report does not specify the exact start and end dates behind the 20-year calculation, or the date on which the stated current values were measured. Because returns can change with the measurement window, the $20,000 and $8,000 figures should be read as the article’s estimates rather than live account balances.
The source also does not provide a detailed calculation methodology, such as the treatment of fees, taxes or the timing of dividend reinvestment. Its figures are historical, and the report’s discussion of possible AI-related risks is a warning about exposure, not confirmation that a market bubble will occur.
Future Returns Will Reflect New Conditions
There is no specific upcoming event in the report. Investors following the comparison can check updated fund holdings, performance figures and index changes, while watching how interest rates and company earnings affect technology-heavy stocks and the broader market. Any new comparison should name its measurement dates and state whether it includes reinvested dividends.
The historical figures do not establish which ETF will perform better over the next 20 years. QQQ and SPY remain exposed to market losses, and their different concentrations mean they may respond differently to future economic and market conditions.
Key Questions
What would $1,000 invested in QQQ 20 years ago be worth?
Kiplinger estimates it would be worth about $20,000, including reinvested dividends. The report does not provide the exact dates used for the calculation.
What would the same investment in SPY be worth?
The report estimates about $8,000, also based on total return with dividends reinvested. This is a historical estimate, not a forecast or guarantee.
Why did QQQ outperform SPY in the comparison?
Kiplinger points to the strong performance of large technology and communications companies over the period and QQQ’s heavier exposure to major Nasdaq-listed nonfinancial stocks. That explanation concerns the period measured and does not predict future returns.
Was QQQ less risky than SPY?
No such conclusion follows from the report. It says QQQ had greater volatility and fell about 36% from its peak during the 2021–22 downturn, compared with roughly 25% for SPY.
Do the figures include dividends?
Yes. Kiplinger describes the annualized returns as total returns, meaning price changes plus reinvested dividends. The supplied source does not detail its treatment of taxes, fees or exact calculation dates.
Source: kiplinger.com
